Me, My and I: Conflict Resolution

free essayRiddles, contradictions, enigmas, polarities, and paradoxes are an imperative part of nature. They are also a chief element in creative thinking. Therefore, for one to achieve the ability to resolve conflict, one must be willing to embrace its innate nature. Ergo, learning about the conflict is the only way to provide a viable solution (Cloke & Goldsmith, 2011).

The best example is the conflict titled life and death. To have a life translates to a resolution of the conflict and to achieve this, one must accept the paradox and enigma that life can end in an instance. Further, it means accepting the contradiction of not solving the problem too quickly so as to solve the problem.

It is more important to discover that what got educated over the years could be irrelevant or worse, wrong. Incorrect or irrelevant information can be more detrimental than the absence of it. Information is power since it can instigate, direct and sustain behavior. Ergo, one will be doing the wrong thing, ultimately creating bigger problems (Cloke & Goldsmith, 2011). The best way to keep in touch with ignorance is to follow the Socrates prerogative. It is imperative to remain curious, skeptical and listen to the counsel of experts.

Get a price quote

For instance, one can be ignorant of the latest trends in technology despite having a smartphone, intelligence, and an impressive societal status. To eliminate the ignorance, a person will need to talk to someone with the requisite knowledge regardless of their perceived intelligence and class. The best way to avoid being caught up in past problems and future solutions is to understand that the present is real. The past and future are not. Therefore deal and act with what is real. Unlearning calls for a complete upheaval of the school of thought and mindsets, to replicate overt behavior, character, and destiny.

The difficulty in letting things happen remains fueled by an innate locus of control and the fear of the unknown. The need for control stems from our inborn drive to survive. Unless one harnesses the help of relaxation techniques or religion (faith), it would be difficult to let things happen naturally and watch, without intervening.

For instance, as a mother, it takes a supreme amount of effort to watch your child or let your son get hurt for learning purposes. The only way to eliminate the fear of the unknown is to know, and knowing emanates from learning.

Our outstanding writers are mostly educated to MA and PhD level

The distinction between what is, what is not and what could not be is thinly veiled. The elimination of one distorts or eliminates the other. For instance, one could not be white and a woman if they are indeed black and male. Removing the black man does not give a white female. The ability to see ‘what’ and ‘who’ depends on someone’s acuity. What one understands does not translate to the nature of understanding, but how one understands does.

For instance if I comprehend a cow, it does not suggest anything about my comprehension aptitude. However, if I cognize a cow to be a mammal with an udder and the ability to give meat and milk that speaks volumes.

For good to exist, there has to be a parallel of evil because that is how we understand and know what is good. In essence, we recognize good because of evil. Ergo, for a strength to be a strength, there must be its corresponding weakness. People learn more from failure than success because, in success, nothing needs to be solved (Cloke & Goldsmith, 2011). Hence, continued success leads to complacency due to a lack of things to solve and subsequently, learn. Success can be viewed as failure and failure as success.

The best example is Thomas Edison. He failed more times than any other inventor (especially with his light bulb and electricity project), yet history postulates that he had more patents and inventions than any other creator, living or dead.